Some of the ridiculous rules of the NCAA

This is just an example of how ridiculous some of the rules the NCAA has come up with. Now I'm not saying ALL the rules and regulations are far fetched, but there is a world of difference between a player taking money and giving a kid a ride to school. But, if the NCAA decided to push it, the university and player could get the same punishment for either example. Follow the link and read the article to see how fine of a line it is between breaking rules and playing by them.




http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Today-in-NCAA-Tedium-It-8217-s-pretty-easy-to-?urn=ncaaf-wp2456

College basketball toughest venues

Good read, but kinda surprising to see Kentucky ranked 5th behind the likes of Wisconsin, and New Mexico? But I will agree that the atmosphere in Rupp could stand to be a little more intimidating for opposing teams. Follow the link for the entire list











http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/news?slug=jn-king_college_basketball_toughest_venues_061611

www.bigbluecorner.blogspot.com

Calipari contract extension in the works

University of Kentucky Atheletic Director Mitch Barnhart took to twitter today to assure Kentucky fans that he had no interest in the now vacant Tennessee AD job. While addressing his future at Kentucky, he also discussed the status of John Calipari's contract.


@UKMitchBarhart: "We are working on an extension with Cal to ensure that he has a long tenure at Kentucky"


@UKMitchBarnhart: "Cal and I are the same age and share some of the same thoughts on our careers, and I'd like to align his contract with my current 8-yr deal."

@UKMitchBarnhart: "Once we get a finalized contract, we'll make a formal announcement."



Barnhart didn't mention when the contract would be complete, but there have been assumptions that it could be by the end of the month, before Lee Todd retires.

John Calipari nominated for an Emmy

It appears that Kentucky head coach John Calipari has been nominated for a Regional Emmy Award for his involvement in the "Hoops for Haiti" benefit that he helped put together. The benefit raised over 1.3 million dollars from donations from Kentucky fans, ex Kentucky coaches, and others.


Sure it's just a "regional" Emmy, but still an Emmy, and imagine the outcry from rival fans and media (UofL, Forde, Thaymel) if he would happen to win the award.


But in all seriousness, Congrats to Coach Cal and all those involved for raising that amount of money for the people of Haiti in their time of need. It's something that in my mind never got the national recognition that it deserved.

Kentucky 4th best coaching job? Really?

   Mike Decourcy of Sporting News ranks Kentucky the 4th best college coaching job in America.  Who is the three above UK? 


   1.  UNC

   2.  UCLA

   3.  Texas


   The only one on the list above Kentucky I agree with is UNC, but UCLA and Texas?   UCLA maybe, if it was in the 60s and 70s, but they haven't been much to talk about as of late.   Texas?  That is a complete joke, but his reason for Texas at 3rd is a good one "there's so much talent and money - and minimal pressure to win it all. What more could a coach want?"   True there is minimal pressure, but I'm just not sure if that is reason enough to rank them at 3rd.  


   I think Kentucky's rank at 4 is about right, except I would have them one slot higher at three behind UNC and Duke.  Speaking of Duke, they have a right to be offended where Decourcy has them ranked (8th).
If Duke isn't one of the top three coaching job's in America, then I don't know who is.


Either way, follow the link for his entire top 10


http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2011-06-07/the-best-college-basketball-coaching-jobs-start-with-unc

Doron Lamb one of the most underrated players in the country?

   According to Yahoo Sports Jason King,  Doron Lamb is one of the most underrated players in the country.   I have to say that I agree.  Follow the link for the full story...


http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/news?slug=jn-king_most_underrated_players_college_basketball_060811

Should student athletes get paid?

This little debate has been making it's round since Steve Spurier made the suggestion at the SEC meetings in Destin Florida yesterday. Everyone has been giving their opinion on the matter, so I figured it was time for mine.


Student athletes have been earning universities BIG money for years, with no finical benefit coming to the STUDENT ATHLETE. I know they are SUPPOSED to be there for an education and some are, but let's be honest. The ones who are gifted enough to achieve the ultimate goal of "playing for pay" aren't really there for the academic benefits the school has to offer.


Just about every kid who is fortunate enough to actually play division 1 basketball, has the dream of going to the next level. Although most don't succeed in reaching that dream, they work their tails off to have a chance. All the while, the big name university sets back and rakes in piles of cash from jersey sells, ticket sells, and TV programing that the student athlete made possible. And what does the student athlete get in return? Don't give me the " a free education" argument, because the other students get the same education (when on scholarship academic or other) and don't have to put in near the work.


As a "student athlete" you are expected to go to practice, attend all team functions (weight training ect.) and not to mention all games, home and away. But still have time to go to class study for tests and then attend your tutor sessions. Oh, and did I mention that as a "student athlete" your scholarship is good on a year to year basis. Though most coaches never revoke a scholarship for not producing on the court, field what have you, the option is there.


When coach Spurier brought up the idea, he said he thought that the athletes should get paid $300 a game for every game they play. That doesn't go for all sports, just the ones that actually produce a revenue. I tend to agree with this, because let's face it, the rifle, swim badminton teams will never produce the amount of money that football, basketball, baseball teams do.


Not to mention while playing football or basketball (not sure about other sports) it is against NCAA regulations for you to have a job, in fear of the place of business over paying the student. So really, the NCAA has brought this on by limiting the ("student athletes) ability to make money on his/her own by honest work.


By paying the kids the $300 as suggested, it would also curb the temptation to take money from agents or some other outside source as has occured in the past, and no doubt still does.
So, in my opinion pay the kids for the work they put in and dedication they show the universities that they represent with pride. Give them some money to go out on dates, buy clothes (the honest way) and quit making the money that the boosters wave in front of them appear so tempting. It will help in the grand scheme of things.